On 2014-09-19 09:56, Warren Young wrote:
3. Other than time, is there a reason you haven't released R50b yet? It seems to pass its own test suite here, so if I adopt it, I'm committing to releasing R50b shortly, unless there are traps I haven't discovered.
I suspect it was just a matter of time (or lack thereof).
4. What do you think about replacing mksh in Cygwin with ksh93? It seems OSS-enough to make Red Hat happy. [2]
We could ship both and just not have a ksh -> mksh symlink. But if you do decide to build ksh93, then please be sure to add the Fedora patchset, as there are a lot of fixes there.
Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple