Greetings, Sebastien Vauban! >>> The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to >>> Emacs. >>> >>> But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same >>> range of characters in both worlds? >> >> You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular glyph.
> Yes, I was. >> Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with >> differing UTF-8 support. If they don't have that glyph (which is >> likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it >> from another font with the same dimensions (I don't know if mintty >> does font substitution and if so, how) and the results very much >> depend on the font maps used. > I didn't know about that mechanism. But, then, the question is: why does > Windows Emacs find a substitution, and not Cygwin Emacs (for the same > font)? Because of different substitution mechanics. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdae...@yandex.ru) 11.09.2014, <16:30> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
