On 7/18/2014 02:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> Is this essentially the same problem as described here? >>> >>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-05/msg00180.html> >> >> No, I think it is an unforeseen consequence of the patch [3] to fix that bug >> [4], which I believe is present in 4.8.3-1, introducing a new problem when >> an executable which doesn't depend on libgcc dlopen()s a dll which does. >> >> [1] https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-07/msg00083.html >> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61752 >> [3] https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2013-07/msg00528.html >> [4] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57982 > > I asked DJ to take another look, but I guess ultimately we need the > attention of one of the GCC Windows maintainers. Kai Tietz seems to be > unavailable right now, unfortunately. >
Looks like I haven't had much luck at poking the code to work over the weekends.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
