On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Please keep mail on list.
>
> Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 November 2002 04:39 pm, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >>> I guess I'm looking for conformation that cygwin binaries do not
> >>> honor the symlinks.
> >>
> >> Sure, cygwin binaries do. But *only* Cygwin binaries. And the
> >> Windows DLL loaded isn't a Cygwin binary.
> >
> > The application I'm running is uic.exe, a binary I compiled under
> > cygwin with gcc-3.2. The libqt-mt.dll, is a .dll I compiled under
> > cygwin with gcc-3.2, so that should make both the binaries cygwin
> > binaries, correct?
>
> Yep. But the bit of code that links them together (i.e. an internal part of
> Windows) isn't.
> Therefore, symlinks to DLLs *do not work*. Unavoidably.
>
> Max.
FWIW, hard links do, if you're on an NT system.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"Water molecules expand as they grow warmer" (C) Popular Science, Oct'02, p.51
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
