On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'll once again point out that gdb, binutils, and gcc seem to get by > just fine without this. And, maybe I missed something, but I don't see > search on sourceforge.net either. Given that, I don't see how this can > be a huge barrier to entry.
Noted. However this is an irrelevant conclusion. The fact that they are successful does not mean Cygwin wont benefit from a search function. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Warren Young wrote: > If you think web code repository searching and a public bug tracker are > primary barriers to contribution, you aren't being honest with yourself. > They are nice, but not necessary. I am honest with myself. I, as everyone have limited time. I will not waste my time with an archaic system and maintainers who fail to see the light of day when there are better ways I can spend my time, example http://github.com/stars/svnpenn -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
