On Mar 3 18:47, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > > >> > I've just uploaded a new snapshot to http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > >> > >> I've sent a reply with testing details, but it may have been caught by SPAM > >> deflection for "excess use of foreign language". > >> Please disregard this notification, if a message will finally come through. > >> > >> > Please try it out. Average timings from your environment (process > >> > startup, and calling `id') would be nice. > >> > >> Oh, and I thought of a way to test only invocation times. > >> I ran /bin/true alot... > >> > >> db_cache: no > >> Timer 2 Elapsed: 0:00:00,75 > >> Stable (+-0.2 regardless of current credentials.) > >> > >> db_cache: yes > >> Timer 2 Elapsed: 0:00:00,85 (current user) > >> Timer 2 Elapsed: 0:00:00,75 (different user) > >> Unstable results. (I.e. vary by ~.10 in both cases.) > >> > >> Default caching settings. > >> Timer 2 Elapsed: 0:00:01,15 > >> Unstable results. (I.e. vary by ~.15 or more in all cases.) > > > So the process start takes 0.3 secs extra for you. Is that feasible? > > Would you rather keep the new "db_cache" setting as an option? What > > do you think is the best default, objectively spoken? > > I could never notice it. And it's not 0.3 sec, it's closer to 0.005sec (the > cycle was run about sixty times, so, divide approptely) > I'd need to test it in domain environment, but I don't have access to one with > Cygwin installed right now. Or, perhaps, I do?... let me check something.
Sure. > In the meantime, I see my previous mail was indeed caught in the middle. I'll > repost it with a link to test results. Nah, never mind. I'm more interested of your experiences than in dry numbers :) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgp2gNyTk3Z3H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
