> BGINFO4X writes: >> I did it, and the results are diferent. > > Because you made it so. > >> I attach on the email both setup results: with commandline and with GUI. > > So you managed to trick setup into not installing some Base packages in > the GUI. If you wouldn't have done that, you'd have installed the exact > same packages in both cases (I've checked).
On my humble opinion, If I check ONLY bash with GUI, and I use the command-line "setup-x86.exe -g -o --no-desktop --no-shortcuts --no-startmenu --local-install %CYGWINALOCALPACKAGES% --quiet-mode --root %CYGWINADMINDIR% --packages bash" both results should be the same. Perhaps I'm wrong, and perhaps I need to understand how setup.exe works, but perhaps both results should be the same. ins't it? :) Thanks a lot for your time. >> What I'm doing is trying to install ONLY bash, not the Base category, >> so I think that you are wrong. > > You always have to have Base installed (which already includes bash). > If you really want to create your own installer you'd first need to > understand what setup.exe is doing and why. > > > Regards, > Achim. > -- > +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ > > SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: > http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada > > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
