Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the relevant code was obvious then it would be trivial to fix. I'm > not even convinced that there is a cygwin problem here. It doesn't > appear to be doing anything wrong. However, unless you are doing something > with ttys I don't see why that's appropriate.
from a quick look i found /dev/piper and things like that in tty.cc and since thats what the strace logs are also showing i thought tty.cc is relevant. now please correct me if i'm wrong, but when it works with 1.1.18 and not with 1.3.x and the only constant that changes is cygwin, wouldn't every fan of logic scream out loud then: it's cygwin! :) anyway i'll try to provide more information and will do some additional testing. and i'll write the cdrecord developer about my new findings and see what he thinks about it. thomas -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
