Le Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:20:20 +0100, Corinna Vinschen a écrit : > On Nov 6 22:30, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Le Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:59:43 -0400, Christopher Faylor a écrit : >> >> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:10:48PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:16:10AM +0800, JonY wrote: >> >>>On 7/26/2013 01:20, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:10:17AM +0800, JonY wrote: >> >>>>> On 7/25/2013 23:14, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I'm still a (silent) gcc maintainer so I can presumably accept >> >>>>>> this patch. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Are there outstanding patches that need attention? If so, >> >>>>>> please send URLs from the gcc-patches archive here so that I can >> >>>>>> attend to them. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> This libgcc patch, and some minor patches at >> >>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00416.html. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> There are some others from Yaakov's gcc builds, but let's start >> >>>>> with smaller patches first. >> >>>> >> >>>> It will probably be a couple of days before I can give these >> >>>> adequate attention. >> >>>> >> >>>> Ok to submit your name as an upstream approver, JonY? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>I have not approved any patches for GCC, not sure if I can act as >> >>>approver. Kai usually approves and commits any mingw* related gcc >> >>>patches but he is not in currently. >> >> >> >>Uh, yeah. AFAIK, you aren't listed as a package approver so it would >> >>be very difficult for you to approve anything. >> >> >> >>Ok, nevermind. >> > >> > Did this ever get resolved? Did Kai apply the patches? >> > >> > cgf >> >> Any progress on this very nasty libgcc bug? > > I pinged the upstream maintainer who probably wasn't aware of this yet.
By the way, i found: * http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57680 which looks very similar. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
