On 7/4/2013 8:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'm ok with that, but I think we should drop the "32" from MINGW in
the first place.
Does anybody rely on the "WOW64" in uname -s output? I just checked
the scripts in /bin in my installation and none of it seems to check
for that info.
And then again, it *is* redundant, given the uname -m output...
cygwin64$ uname -s
CYGWIN_NT-6.1
cygwin64$ uname -m
x86_64
cygwin32$ uname -s
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64
cygwin32$ uname -m
i686
Yep, seems redundant.
--
Chuck
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
