On Jun 12 13:51, Damien Doligez wrote: > On 2013-06-11, at 17:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Ouch! As long as gcc 4.7.2 is not the defualt compiler, that's kind > > of borderline since you force people to install the test release of gcc. > > > > Granted, it's time we get a 4.7 or 4.8 based gcc ASAP... > > Another solution would be to compile OCaml with the 4.5.3-1 version > of the GCC package, if there's any way to do that. OCaml 3.12.1 was > compiled with that version and it didn't exhibit the bug. > > But I didn't find any obvious way to go back to an old package that > is not in setup's list anymore.
Click on the version number of the package. It will cycle through the available versions and other options (like "keep", "reinstall", "uninstall"). > I apologize for unwittingly breaking so many things with this OCaml > update. No worries, stuff like that happens once in a while. I guess we should let this just stay as is for now and see to it that we get a new gcc version soon. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
