On May 29 18:51, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > But now that you mention it, is cygutils *supposed* to be in Base? > It is marked category: Utils, but seems to be pulled into Base only > because of cygwin-doc (which *is* in Base, oddly enough; shouldn't > it just be Doc?) listing it as a dependency.
That sounds strange. Was cygwin-doc always in Base? It contains the cygwin docs and basic man pages but that doesn't really qualify for the Base category. Also, why does cygwin-doc depend on cygutils at all? It only contains info and man pages, so the deps should be coreutils and man, but nothing else, AFAICS. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
