Re: problem with bash

[Randall R Schulz]

At 10:58 2002-11-14, you wrote:

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

Well, if you really want something equivalent to 'ls *', you'd need to do something like

...

Huh?!? Just type ls! You don't need anything else and certainly not something as complicated as what you propose.

Andrew,

You're not paying attention!

Remember, both asking and answering should be tempered by inspection of the list's or the topic's history.


Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/