On 2/11/2013 14:23, Achim Gratz wrote:
Warren Young writes:
From my perspective, though, I have a new problem, which is scraping
together enough free time to set up the SQLite test suite on a machine
here and set it to grinding, so I can exonerate the recent .15.1
build.
That's the second time I hear you talking about running the test suite
for SQLite… where'd you get that from?
From where? Nowhere. I decided it would be a good idea all by myself.
As I saw it, I released some test builds, they caused a new problem, so
I thought it would be a good idea to see if SQLite's own test suite[*]
gave the same results on both .13 and .15.1. If so, then there is no
regression on Cygwin from that perspective, so that adds a reason not to
consider the BDB failures with Cygwin Subversion a problem.
[*] https://www.sqlite.org/testing.html
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
