On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:57:32AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >I've no objection. But would somebody PLEASE tell me what the HELL >we're waiting for with respect to the 64bit key_t change in newlib? > >I've had a new release of cygipc waiting for months, predicated on that >change, which I THOUGHT would happen "real soon".
Who was supposed to make the change? I haven't been paying much attention to what's required. It does seem that our cygserver maintainer is MIA, though, so maybe that's part of the problem. I was hoping that we'd have a little more cygserver exposure in cygwin 1.3.1[345] but it doesn't seem to be happening. cgf >Now, I have to revert all of that (I didn't make a branch point at the >time -- why bother? the change was "imminent") before I release any >other updates. > >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg00314.html and following. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
