On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >>Problem fixed ... see below >> >>On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Christopher Faylor >><email deleted> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:00:45PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >>>>Hello, >>>> >>>>I am running rebaseall manually to enable X11: I found a post >>>>suggesting to rebase to 0x77000000 >>>> >>>>I am following instructions on http://cygwin.wikia.com/wiki/Rebaseall >>> >>> You realize that the project web site is: http://cygwin.com/ right? You >>> can't expect instructions from unrelated sites to work. You shouldn't >>> need to use the above anymore with new improvements to reabase. >> >>True. But I did not find anything else better and the instructions on >>that site jibed with what I read on the cygwin mailing list over the >>years. That's why I went with it. > > But this wasn't actually "better". Just running rebaseall, as suggested > by the official Cygwin FAQ is the correct advice. >
I agree > cgf > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
