On May 25 16:52, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On May 25 15:18, Denis Excoffier wrote: > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:54:14PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >> On May 25 14:17, Denis Excoffier wrote: > > >> > 97 6945 [main] date 3440 pinfo::thisproc: myself dwProcessId 3440 > > >> > 76 7021 [main] date 3440 time: 1337945628 = time(0) > > >> > --- Process 3440, exception C0000005 at 610DDC3C > > >> > 1343 8364 [main] date 3440 exception::handle: In > > >> > cygwin_except_handler exception 0xC0000005 at 0x610DDC3C sp 0x2127F0 > > >> > 92 8456 [main] date 3440 exception::handle: In > > >> > cygwin_except_handler signal 11 at 0x610DDC3C > > >> > 86 8542 [main] date 3440 exception::handle: In > > >> > cygwin_except_handler calling 0x0 > > >> > 320 8862 [main] date 3440 > > >> > D:\Home\dexcoff1\dexcoff1\cyg12e\bin\date.exe: *** fatal error - > > >> > internal error reading the windows environment - too many environment > > >> > variables? > > >> > > >> Grr. The fault handler covers the actual problem. I'm going to send > > >> you the URL to a test DLL in a minute via PM, if you don't mind. It has > > >> the fault handler removed, so instead of the "internal error reading the > > >> windows environment" error you should see a "real" SEGV, and the crash > > >> should hopefully produce a more valid stacktrace. That's what I'd be > > >> interested in. > > > > Here are the results: > > > > % /usr/bin/strace -o date.trace2 /usr/bin/date > > 8972 [main] date 716 exception::handle: Exception: > > STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION > > 10607 [main] date 716 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to > > date.exe.stackdump > > % cat date.exe.stackdump > > Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=610E4BB1 > > eax=000E000C ebx=611FDA9A ecx=00000020 edx=0022AAC4 esi=60FD0000 > > edi=61006582 > > ebp=00212978 esp=002128F0 > > program=D:\Home\dexcoff1\dexcoff1\cyg12e\bin\date.exe, pid 716, thread main > > cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003B gs=0000 ss=0023 > > Stack trace: > > Frame Function Args > > 00212978 610E4BB1 (00222A91, 611F7FCF, 0022AAC4, 002229F0) > > 00222A28 610E9092 (611AEA40, 00222A50, 611F8280, 611F7FB8) > > 0022AA68 610E9270 (611AEA40, 00000040, 611F8280, 611F7FB8) > > 0022AAA8 610E9421 (611AEA40, 00000040, 611F8280, 611F7FB8) > > 0022AB08 610C7090 (0022ABE0, 0000074C, 00020019, 0022AB54) > > 0022AB38 610C6E5A (0022ABE0, 0000074C, 00020019, 611F7FA6) > > Bzz. Thank you. One of the debug output statements was broken. > A struct was given to the debug_printf function by value, but the > function expects a pointer. Should be fixed now in CVS.
I just uploaded a new snapshot. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
