On 5/21/2012 3:43 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
On 5/21/2012 3:15 PM, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote:
I don't think Warren's note said there was a 4GB 32-bit executable.
I think it said a 4GB 32-bit executable would be the worst case
scenario for 64-bit executable size bloat.
It might be. What I was saying was if it doesn't exist (and probably
isn't likely to exist anytime soon) then I don't personally worry
about it. YMMV.
Well have you considered the following: "Anyway I think I'm
done with this topic"? I didn't think so.
Are you saying Warren should not post a response to the mailing list,
just because you personally are no longer interested in the discussion?
No I'm saying he should response my post, citing me as if to expect
and answer from me when I am no longer interested in the topic.
I mean: He should *not* response to my post...
--
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
Oops. My brain just hit a bad sector.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
