On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 04:13:32PM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >On 5/15/2012 4:57 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> On 5/15/2012 12:53 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> Ok, fair enough. We're also not going to add an alias for more to >>> every single shipping shell. As was mentioned in the first response >>> to the original post there is actually a more in util-linux package. >>> That should be reason enough not to add a simple alias/symlink. >> I guess that's also fair enough... >Went to update my Cygwin archive and decided to include more in my local >package dir. So I search for it and I find nothing but xmore. I tried >looking in Utils and couldn't find anything about util-linux or even >linux. Went cygwin.com and Search Packages. Looked for more. I don't >find any package that has it. I do see things about less. > >OK so where's more hiding?
Wow. We're still talking about this? It really isn't that hard. Just type "util-linux" in the search box for setup.exe. If you're looking for the package which holds more.exe then search for more.exe in the package search. You'll then find util-linux. There are enough packages in the distro which include the word "more" that you won't find util-linux in the first thirty matches. It is on the main search page though if you scroll down. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
