Ken Brown writes: > > I don't use lyx (though I use tex extensively), so maybe there's > something I don't understand. But is it really necessary for Cygwin's > lyx to support a native Windows tex?
Necessary? No. Useful? Yes. > Wouldn't it be more reasonable for > users of a native Windows tex to use a native Windows lyx? Until recently, the only Cygwin TeX engine was teTeX, which does not support XeTeX. If you wanted a Cygwin version of lyx, you could not have used XeTeX, unless you used MikTeX, for example. -- Enrico -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
