Greetings, Oliver! > On the other hand, the cygwin documentation seems to claim that cygwin > will support both, win32 style paths and POSIX style paths.
Cygwin, as in, the utilities, when fed with native path - mostly works. Specific program on the inside of it - it's up to that program. > Are there any plans to make mksh on cygwin win32-path aware, or will > mksh on cygwin support only POSIX? You have to ask mksh author(s). > If it remains to be POSIX only, and pdksh apparently gone from the list > of shells, is the only alternative to rewrite all existing ksh scripts > that might use win32 style paths? The last trend in *NIX society, that I noticed, is to write portable scripts. Which means, they should work with /bin/sh. (The base POSIX shell implementation.) -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdae...@freemail.ru) 01.12.2011, <20:26> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
