Mark Geisert (that's me) wrote: > I haven't yet diff'd the two cygchecks > you sent but maybe that'll lead somewhere.
I've now done that. The 'good' cygcheck shows many more packages installed than the 'bad' cygcheck. But the only package version differences I found were for bzr, find and mercurial; the 'good' cygcheck paradoxically shows earlier versions for those three packages. Hard to see how those package differences could matter though. About the only thing I can think of, and it's a crazy idea, is that the 'good' environment, with more packages installed, is somehow supplying something that's emulated badly in the 'bad' environment. Figuring out if that's the case would involve building your executable with every possible "verbose" switch turned on so you can identify exactly where every item going into the executable is coming from. Repeated in both 'good' and 'bad' environments. Or, you could take heart that you've got a good build you can work with now and just run with that. Maybe somebody else has another approach to try. HTH, ..mark -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
