On Oct 23 16:05, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 10/23/2011 3:57 PM, Marc Girod wrote: > > > > > >Marc Girod wrote: > >> > >>To be honest, I find that cygcheck too behaves strangely: > >> > >>... > >>~> cygcheck -l rebase-3.0.1-1 > >> > >OK: my mistake (Thanks Marco): > > > >~> cygcheck -c rebase > >Cygwin Package Information > >Package Version Status > >rebase 3.0.1-1 OK > >~> cygcheck -l rebase > >/usr/bin/peflags.exe > >/usr/bin/peflagsall > >/usr/bin/rebase.exe > >/usr/bin/rebaseall > >/usr/share/doc/Cygwin/rebase-3.0.1.README > > > >No rebasedb mentioned... > >I start reading the README again. Not done that for quite some time. > > > >Marc > > rebase.db is new introduction of rebase-4, > but as you found the maintainer made a package error > > As workaround with rebase-4.0.0-1 you can, from ash, > > mkdir /usr/etc > rebaseall
I suggest to create a mount point instead: $ mount -f -o bind /etc /usr/etc That makes /etc and /usr/etc the same dir for the time being. This way, when the package is updated, the rebase DB is already in the right spot. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
