On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:55:06PM +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote: >On 25/07/2011 17.11, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:36:58PM +0200, Marco atzeri wrote: >>> On 7/21/2011 11:43 PM, Marco atzeri wrote: >>>> looking on the mc subshell issue, I found that mc >>>> suppose that the subshell will receive a SIGHUP >>>> when mc exit and close the master side of pty. >>>> >>>> Is such assumption wrong or it is a missing piece of >>>> cygwin pty implementation ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------- extract from subshell.c -------------- >>>> /* Attach all our standard file descriptors to the pty */ >>>> >>>> /* This is done just before the fork, because stderr must still */ >>>> /* be connected to the real tty during the above error messages; */ >>>> /* otherwise the user will never see them. */ >>>> >>>> dup2 (subshell_pty_slave, STDIN_FILENO); >>>> dup2 (subshell_pty_slave, STDOUT_FILENO); >>>> dup2 (subshell_pty_slave, STDERR_FILENO); >>>> >>>> close (subshell_pipe[READ]); >>>> close (subshell_pty_slave); /* These may be FD_CLOEXEC, but just in >>>> case... */ >>>> /* Close master side of pty. This is important; apart from */ >>>> /* freeing up the descriptor for use in the subshell, it also */ >>>> /* means that when MC exits, the subshell will get a SIGHUP and */ >>>> /* exit too, because there will be no more descriptors pointing */ >>>> /* at the master side of the pty and so it will disappear. */ >>>> close (subshell_pty); >>>> >>>> /* Execute the subshell at last */ >>>> >>>> switch (subshell_type) >>>> { >>>> case BASH: >>>> execl (shell, "bash", "-rcfile", init_file, (char *) NULL); >>>> break; >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> It seems that mc is correct in the expectation. >>> >>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/close.html >>> >>> "If fildes refers to the master side of a pseudo-terminal, and this is >>> the last close, a SIGHUP signal shall be sent to the controlling >>> process, if any, for which the slave side of the pseudo-terminal is the >>> controlling terminal. It is unspecified whether closing the master side >>> of the pseudo-terminal flushes all queued input and output." >>> >>> >>> I don't find such implementation on cygwin >>> >>> fhandler_pty_master::close () >>> >>> Am I looking in the wrong place ? >> >> (checked into this a little more) >> >> Sort of. If the process is doing a read, it is supposed to detect that >> the tty has been closed and a SIGHUP is supposed to be sent. It is not >> precisely the same thing as sending a SIGHUP when the master closes but >> I'm surprised that, in principle, it doesn't amount to the same thing. >> >> Just see any of the SIGHUPs in fhandler_tty.cc. They are all supposed >> to be dealing with this scenario. >> >> So, unless bash is not waiting for input (which is unlikely) this should >> work. > >except if bash is sleeping and waiting for signal (or sort of) > >http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#Signals
"sleeping and waiting for signal" would mean that "bash is not waiting for input". If bash isn't waiting for input that would explain the problem. However, I would expect that bash, in this scenario, to be waiting for input. I was hoping you'd provide insight into whether that was the case or not. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple