On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:57:16AM -0400, Edward Lam wrote: >On Wed, April 20, 2011 21:06, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> But, for now, just setting the base to something higher: >> >> rebaseall -b 0x77000000 >> >> would solve some of the problems we've seen. >> >> I don't know if that stomps on system routines or not, though. > >Just curious, why is this even a problem? If the system libraries happen >to use some base address that is already taken up, the loader is supposed >to just choose a different spot.
Maybe you don't understand what rebaseall is used for? It's purpose is to eliminate collisions with other dlls. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
