Hi Marc, On 05.04.2011 10:48, marco atzeri wrote: > you can check the package source and propose the change
I have went through the manual installation of libxml: the package was installed absolutely OK. After "make install" I got: $ ls -1 /usr/local/lib/libxml2* /usr/local/lib/libxml2.a /usr/local/lib/libxml2.dll.a /usr/local/lib/libxml2.la $ ls -1 /usr/local/bin/cygxml2* /usr/local/bin/cygxml2-2.dll I believe this is Cygwin packaging problem, which does not put libxml2.a into destination devel package. I am not familiar with how the binary packages are created. Perhaps you can help me here. Is it possible to have a look at the logs at Cygwin build server? I can attach mine, which show how libxml2.a is successfully build and installed. -- With best regards, Dmitry -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
