Am 02.12.2010 18:54, schrieb Jason Curl:
> Linux getifaddrs():
> * eth0 -> AF_INET
> * eth0 -> AF_INET6
>
> Cygwin getifaddrs():
> * {xxx} -> AF_INET6
> * {xxx}:1 -> AF_INET
>
> This is another reason why I think it could be architecturally simpler to just
> have multiple records and to drop the interface indices all together of the
> form
> ":1".
Is there anything that mandates Linux/Solaris behaviour? Else you might as well
argue with BSD which doesn't have these :N extensions.
--
Matthias Andree
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
