On 8/31/2010 10:08 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Here's what I'm saying: It makes absolutely no sense that moving the
call would have any effect. The code is the way it is for a reason
so we're not going to just revert the change.
I don't think anyone is asking to revert the change.
In any case, is it absolutely necessary for us to call
wait_for_sigthread() before we do the other initialization in
dll_crt0_1() ? ie. can we move it further down? Or perhaps we can
reorder the initialization code somewhat such that we can do more work
before calling wait_for_sigthread()?
Regards,
-Edward
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
