On Aug 21 15:47, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > On 21/08/2010 3:35 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>Chris [Sutcliffe], can we please revert this change for now? It breaks > >>>building Win32 apps, if the link order prefers kernel32.a over advapi32.a. > >>Done. > >Thanks. Are you sure that only CreateProcessAsUserW is affected? > > In a word, no. I'll have to go through the file function by > function checking against the other def files...... sigh. > >>>In theory, shouldn't the gendef script drop symbols from kernel32.def > >>>which are defined in advapi32.dll? That would fix the problem, afaics. > >>That would be ideal, but I'm not sure what the capabilities of > >>gendef are in this respect. > >I'm curious, where is that gendef script? For some reason it isn't part > >of the w32api sources in CVS. Wouldn't it make sense to check it in as > >well? > > Nope, it's already part of Cygwin: > > http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-cat.cgi?file=gendef%2Fgendef-1.0-svn2931-1&grep=gendef.exe
Uh, *that* gendef. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
