On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:47:33PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >2010/8/19 Andrew Schulman: >>> The question is if the maintainers really want that, and cgf and I are >>> just 2 out of ~60 maintainers, maintaining over 1400 packages. ?From >>> these ~60 maintainers we have quite a few who either don't reply to any >>> mail about their package, or who only reply after some nudging. >> >> Agreed, but OTOH I'd guess that half of all of the bugs reported on this >> list are for just two packages: cygwin and setup.exe. ?If the maintainers >> of those two packages think a bug tracker would be useful, we should make >> one. ?If they don't, it's probably not worth bothering. > >setup already has a tracker, using the official sourceware bugzilla. > http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ >used rarely > >Product cygwin - Component setup.exe > > http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=cygwin&component=setup.exe > >I have no idea how one can interface bugzilla or any other tracker to >our package - maintainer list: > http://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint
Just to be clear: The above URL is not intended as a mechanism for people to send private messages to package maintainers. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
