On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 06:39:25PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Aug 6 10:51, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> On 6 August 2010 10:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> > On Aug ??6 09:40, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 09:33:41AM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >> >I assume d_fileno and d_reclen may be part of __d_unused1 or >> >> >__d_internal1? ??I'd appreciate some help here, since I'm not sure what >> >> >to do at this point. >> >> >> >> No, they are not part of either of those fields. ??If they were >> >> they would be exposed. >> >> >> >> They simply are not implemented. >> > >> > And they don't have to. ??Per POSIX, only d_ino and d_name can be >> > expected by a portable application(*). >> >> Fair enough, thankfully they are don't seem to be used by the code, so >> I added an '#ifndef __CYGWIN__' around them and have managed to get by >> this. > >Btw., d_fileno is just another old name for d_ino. The Linux headers >defines it thus as `#define d_fileno d_ino'. We can do the same in >Cygwin. Maybe that minimizes some porting effort.
Huh. I thought the d_fileno actually stood for the file handle of the opened directory. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
