On 6/29/2010 10:40 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:35:53AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 06/29/2010 08:34 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
Phooey. dash now depends on cyggcc_s-1.dll, so rebaseall needs to be
taught to add this library to the list of exemptions (similar to
cygwin1.dll).
Or dash could be rebuilt using -static-libgcc. It's not like dash needs
to worry about throwing C++ exceptions across DLL boundaries, and if
dash is meant to be a /bin/sh implementation (even if cygwin still uses
bash for that), then IMO it ought to be -- insofar as is possible --
statically linked.
OK, I'm now trying to figure out how to add -static-libgcc into my
cygport file. Look for an updated dash later today...
In the meantime, you might want to consider linking dash with -static-libgcc.
You know, I thought of that too but then I thought, it's probably better that
dash is statically linked with libgcc instead.
;-)
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
