On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 01:24:29AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:37:01PM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote:
>>On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:16:43PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>On 06/04/2010 03:14 PM, Christopher Wingert wrote:
>>>>Agreed, I would like to make a global change, however, unless I can
>>>>talk to the current maintainer of the fhandler* functions, it seems
>>>>illogical for me to change them (as I have about a week of cygwin dll
>>>>experience).
>>>
>>>You ARE talking to the maintainer of the fhandler* functions - cgf
>>>knows what he's talking about, since he wrote the bulk of them.
>
>>He is? Holy crap, he is more helpful with his sarcasm and doubt than
>>anything else.
>
>Can't really parse that sentence.
>
>>However, it does explains his tone, given that I am picking on his
>>code.
>
>I haven't detected any "picking on" but then I can't claim to have
>written the fhandler* code anymore Corinna has rewritten most of it. I
^
since
>do know that if you want to be taken seriously you really need to send a
>concrete suggestion/patch.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
