> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:35:55AM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: >>Using strace I was able to look at some of the functions that are >>enumerated by debugging calls. >> >>The trace below is done by ls.exe for each file (approximately 95k files >> @ >>88 mSecs/file), approximately 40 mSecs are spent in lstat64() and another >>47 mSecs are spent in getacl(). > > You're undoubtedly misinterpreting the timestamps in strace. They don't > indicate the amount of time spent in anything. They are just timestamps.
Undoubtedly, no. I am doing basic subtraction based on the synchronous call made from the ls.exe executable to the cygwin1.dll and the timestamp provided by strace. > You may be missing how this project is run. The current maintainers of > everything read this mailing list. You don't need to contact anyone > personally. Actually, this is typical of many open source projects. Actually it is atypical for core developers to monitor a high volume generic question list such as this one, at least from my experience on other open source projects. The core developers would leave it to some nay-saying lackey. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
