Dave Korn <dave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com> writes: > On 20/04/2010 20:28, Paul Bibbings wrote: > >> (BTW. I'm guessing by "That'd be my fault" that you're working on gcc >> upstream?) > > I certainly am; my long-term goal is a) to synchronize upstream and > downstream so that in the end there are no cygwin-specific patches needed and > anyone can just build the plain sources from upstream and get a fully > compatible compiler that generates fully compatible executables, and b) to add > any missing support so that we can get features like LTO and graphite working. > > I think we're fairly close to there already, but there might be some minor > incompatibilities in odd corners of C++ related to typeinfos and dynamic > typecasts.
Well, then, I very much look forward to the fruits of all that hard work and am grateful that it appears to be in `safe hands'. And, well, ... thank you! :-) Good luck with that. Regards Paul Bibbings -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
