On Apr 8 10:14, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 08.04.2010, 08:11 Uhr, schrieb Christopher Faylor: > > >On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 10:43:08PM -0400, Mark Levedahl wrote: > >>On 03/31/2010 09:36 PM, Mark Levedahl wrote: > >>>>On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:08:37PM -0400, Mark Levedahl wrote: > >>>>>All of the above connections and i/o processing are done using > >>>>>bog-standard fork, pipe, open, read, write, and associated file > >>>>>commands. Git has no trouble opening all of the processes and pipes > >>>>>under Cygwin 1.7.2. However, in general before the data transfer is > >>>>>complete the demux process issues an error upon getting an incomplete > >>>>>packet (fewer bytes transmitted than declared in the header), and > >>>>>debugging shows the error code of the read() is ENOENT, > >>>>>indicating the > >>>>>pipe or socket has been terminated early. The index-pack process also > >>>>>issues an error due to receipt of an incomplete pack. > >>Given the above, it seems logical the problem is with pipes, and as > >>1.7.4-1 is has fixes for pipes I tried it out and found a significant > >>improvement: using 1.7.2-1 I got 16 failures out of 20 attempts to clone > >>a 17 MByte repo on localhost, using 1.7.4-1 this is down to 3 failures > >>out of 20 attempts. (1.7.3-1 was not an improvement). > > > >And, yet, there were no fixes for pipes in 1.7.4. > > Not to suggest anything particular to Mark, but rather as a general > comment: I wonder how many of the "1.7.X no better" can be > attributed to the replace-on-reboot failure up to and including > setup 2.693. If people rely on that rather than running "uname -a" > or similar, those that were told to reboot may be unaware they're > using the older version.
Good point. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
