Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes: > > > ... > > > This lets the script execute, but I am a little bit worried about the > > > other > > > permissions, "-rw-r--r--" instead of "-rwxrw----". > > > > > > Why are the permissions different? > > > > http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#mount-table > > > > > Is there a way of preserving the original permissions and still fake the > > > user/group info as with "noacl"? > > > > No. Since you're not using AD accounts and no winbind, the ACL returned > > by Samba reflect the UNIX user and UNIX group the file is owned by. > > I don't think there's a reliable way to convert the SIDs in the ACL to > > the current user and primary group, except for another mount flag. > > On second thought, it would still be a lot of work to get this working > right. The mount flag alone doesn't tell us which UNIX SID the Windows > user SID is mapped to. So you would need to set up some mapping file > which Cygwin would have to read at startup, or the passwd file would > need YA special case for the pw_gecos field. Ick. > > Corinna >
Sorry I forgot to mention that the permissions on the Linux machine running the Samba server are more similar to the ones when I mount the network drive without the "noacl" option in Cygwin. This is the ls line from the Linux machine: -rwxrw---- 1 chris tech 1014 Dec 15 14:16 amssetup On Cygwin without "noacl": -rwxrw---- 1 ???????? ???????? 1014 2009-12-15 14:16 amssetup On Cygwin with "noacl" -rw-r--r-- 1 chris None 1014 2009-12-15 14:16 amssetup So apart from the ???????? entries, I think going without the "noacl" option would be the way to go. But I will give it a try with "noacl" and see if it has any undesired side-effects. Thanks Chris -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
