Elfyn,
Let me be clear that I'm not accusing you (or Gareth or Chris F.) of
anything here. As others have pointed out, these worms are clever about
coming up with addresses both for the apparent "From:" address and the next
ply of intended victim recipients.
Here are the routing headers from the message _ostensibly_ from you:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail18.svr.pol.co.uk (mail18.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.67.23])
by morse.concentric.net [Concentric SMTP MX 1.0]
id g9DJ7ih10880; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:07:44 -0400 (EDT)
[1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network]
Errors-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from modem-2289.chimpanzee.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.134.120.241]
helo=mcb-home)
by mail18.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 180nmm-0007hQ-00; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:48:20 +0100
From: "Elfyn McBratney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As you can see, although it claims (suggests? "From:" headers are
distinctly non-authoritative) you're at UT Austin, the message itself did
not originate or traverse any servers there. Nor does Hotmail appear in the
SMTP server-supplied forwarding header. (Concentric is my ISP.)
As I understand these worms, they use other user's address books (are they
called "Contact Lists" in Outlook and Outlook Express?) to come up with
both fraudulent "From:" addresses and recipients. Win32.Bugbear@mm uses
registry data to propagate, too.
Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA
Here's the full text of the message I receive (attachment graciously
elided--in fact, I delete them as soon as I confirm my hunch that they're
worms):
-==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==-
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail18.svr.pol.co.uk (mail18.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.67.23])
by morse.concentric.net [Concentric SMTP MX 1.0]
id g9DJ7ih10880; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:07:44 -0400 (EDT)
[1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network]
Errors-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from modem-2289.chimpanzee.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.134.120.241]
helo=mcb-home)
by mail18.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 180nmm-0007hQ-00; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:48:20 +0100
From: "Elfyn McBratney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Need your Mac OS 8 support plan...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------ISQROT15KBZQSTO"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bcc:
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:48:20 +0100
Content-Type: text/html;
That is really not fare :(
Do you know when we'll get a time-indexed beta-sp ???
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Aumeerally
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: Need your Mac OS 8 support plan...
> > Just wanted to beg you to bring in Mac OS 8 if your on your travels
> towards the office :)...
>
> I may come in Wednesday evening, depending on how the week unfolds...
>
<file://D:\Attachments\connexionscard-pass.txt.scr>[]
connexionscard-pass.txt.scr
-==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==-
At 16:33 2002-10-13, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>I for one would like to know how that happend. If its from hotmail then fare
>do's, sorry. If it was from [EMAIL PROTECTED] thats impossible because
>all I can send through my mailgate is .txt or tars/gz's files...even then
>all archives are extracted/scanned.
>
>What month???
>
>Elfyn
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 11:03 PM
>Subject: Re: Viruses being transported with Cygwin messages
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I might help to know this is the "W32.Bugbear@mm" worm. It has been
> > spreading a lot lately. In today's batch I received 3 copies under
> > different names (supposedly from Christopher Faylor, Gareth Pearce and
> > Elfyn McBratney), each with different contents and different attachment
>names.
> >
> > Here's what Symantec has to say about this worm:
> > <http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Randall Schulz
> > Mountain View, CA USA
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
