On March 10, 2010, Andy Koppe wrote:
> David Byron:
> > mkshortcut is returning 8 when I expect it to return 0.
>
> Yep, known issue.
>
> > I'd love a hand getting mkshortcut to return 0 in this case.
>
> Index: src/mkshortcut/mkshortcut.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/cygwin-apps/cygutils/src/mkshortcut/mkshortcut.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -u -r1.10 mkshortcut.c
> --- src/mkshortcut/mkshortcut.c 3 Dec 2009 08:19:44 -0000 1.10
> +++ src/mkshortcut/mkshortcut.c 11 Mar 2010 05:43:05 -0000
> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@
> }
> persist_file->lpVtbl->Release (persist_file);
> shell_link->lpVtbl->Release (shell_link);
> + return (0);
> }
> else
> {
Thanks for the confirmation. Trying to avoid seeming helpless and demanding
but is there anything I can do to motivate the mkshortcut/cygutils
maintainers to release a version with this patch?
-DB
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
