> The requires: line for orpie mentions lapack. I think this should be > liblapack0?
Hm, you seem to be right. I just uninstalled lapack and liblapack, leaving just liblapack-devel and liblapack0. I quit and restarted orpie, and it runs fine. (If you try to start orpie without any *lapack* packages installed, it just gives a black screen.) It seems to use just cygblas-0.dll, from liblapack0. > For some reason, setup never believes that lapack is installed. It keeps > listing it for installation in the Preview pane. I install it each time, > but it is never listed as an installed package by cygcheck. orpie is the > only package that depends on lapack. Yes, lapack, gcc, and I think one other package do that. It's been discussed here before but I forget the reason. It seems to be uncorrectable at present. I agree that it would be nicer to avoid that, so I'll post a new setup.hint that fixes the dependency. Thanks for reporting this. Andrew. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
