On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:19:27AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jan 15 11:07, Vincent R. wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On 14/01/2010 14:20, Reini Urban wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> I have a working cygwin llvm and llvm-gcc, >> >>>> but had no time to produce a proper package yet. >> >>>> Attached are my cygport files and my local config. >> >>>> No patches were needed. >> >>>> >> >>>> But I haven't bothered to build clang yet, >> >>>> just the Clang llvmc plugin and llvm-gcc, >> >>>> which I thought is harder to build and gives us more gcc >> compatibility. >> >>> >> >>> Here's what I have so far for llvm/clang 2.6; the .cygport may be >> >>> missing something, it's been a few weeks since I've looked at it. >> >> >> >> On the cygwin mailinglist we came to some required clang patches. >> >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-01/msg00587.html >> >> Sorry, untested, as I got unrelated linker errors. >> > >> > The change to tools/CIndex/CIndexer.cpp looks fine if it works. The >> > change to tools/driver/driver.cpp isn't really right; the code really >> > needs to be refactored. The changes to the non-C++ include paths in >> > lib/Frontend/InitHeaderSearch.cpp look a bit suspicious, but it's okay >> > anyway. The change to lib/Headers/stddef.h is completely wrong; what >> > is it supposed to fix? >> >> Still don't understand why cygwin doesn't implement dladdr, it would avoid >> some >> ugly ifdef... > >http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#SHTDI >http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC
And most importantly: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#WJM cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
