Dave Korn wrote:
> Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
>> not sure but I suspect
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> lt_search_path_spec=`$ECHO "$lt_tmp_lt_search_path_spec" | awk '
>> BEGIN {RS=" "; FS="/|\n";} {
>> lt_foo="";
>> lt_count=0;
>> for (lt_i = NF; lt_i > 0; lt_i--) {
>> if ($lt_i != "" && $lt_i != ".") {
>> if ($lt_i == "..") {
>> lt_count++;
>> } else {
>> if (lt_count == 0) {
>> lt_foo="/" $lt_i lt_foo;
>> } else {
>> lt_count--;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> if (lt_foo != "") { lt_freq[[lt_foo]]++; }
>> if (lt_freq[[lt_foo]] == 1) { print lt_foo; }
>> }'`
>> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Is that the original m4 file, or how it gets expanded in the generated
> configure script?
When *I* build it, the configure script has this:
if (lt_foo != "") { lt_freq[lt_foo]++; }
if (lt_freq[lt_foo] == 1) { print lt_foo; }
because the snippet above /is/ from the original .m4 file. I'm not an
awk expert, but it looks ok to me.
>> on
>>
>> if (lt_foo != "") { lt_freq[[lt_foo]]++; }
>> if (lt_freq[[lt_foo]] == 1) { print lt_foo; }
>>
>> awk states sintax error due to double [
>
> Yeah, it would. That's some sort of changequote problem.
Only if Marco's configure script looks like the .m4 and actually still
has double-[.
--
Chuck
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
