As a newbie to Windoze/ACL security, I am probably missing something. But... Why do 'ls and 'find' seem to treat the ACL restrictions differently.
Specifically, 'ls /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' works while 'find /c/Documents and Settings/Administrators' returns: find: `/c/Documents and Settings/Administrator/': Permission denied I would have thought that 'ls' and 'find' would be bound by the same ACL restrictions. Am I missing something basic here in my understanding? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Why-do-%27find%27-and-%27ls%27-act-differently-on-ACLs-tp26250118p26250118.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple