On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:38:59AM +0000, Marco Atzeri wrote: >--- Mar 27/10/09, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > >> On Oct 27 06:52, Fergus wrote: >> >> New versions 3.2.1-1 of >> > >> >> lapack (source) >> >> liblapack0 >> >> liblapack-devel >> > >> > I can see "source" above, but the lack of an >> > install: >> > line under @lapack in the current setup ini file for >> [1.7] datestamp 1256597494 >> > seems to lead to an installation error: >> > Can't open (null) for reading: No such file >> >> I fixed that on sourceware.? The (empty) >> lapack-3.2.1-2.tar.bz2 >> file was missing.? I created one. >> >> >> Corinna > >Thanks, >I have not noticed its absence. > >Is eventually a bug of cygport that does no built the >empty file, or it should the setup.ini build procedure to >advise for it ?
If there is an installation error due to a missing tar.bz2 binary then that would point to a setup.exe problem. There's no reason why an empty file should be required. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
