Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 12:24:35PM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > >>I think it should be included, I've encountered a script or two which was >>looking for this item. I hope others agree and this doesn't get tabled >>like the ksh93 packages (what ever happened to that anyway?). >> > > It's Chuck's call. I agree that it should be in cygutils.
Send the tarball directly to me, David. I'll incorporate it in the next release. I'm also planning to refactor into a 'one Makefile.am to rule them all' build -- but keeding separate programs in their (current) separate subdirectories (cf "Recursive Make Considered Harmful"). This will require yet more changes to the HOW-TO cygutils doco... Nicholas Wourms wrote: >> I hope others agree and this doesn't get tabled >> like the ksh93 packages (what ever happened to that anyway?). > I don't know what happened to ksh93. I've given up. The last I heard from Karsten was on 4/13. He was planning to offer a bare-bones ksh package and a separate ksh-utils package. He was also going to create a ksh-accel and ksh-devel package (for those ksh-speedup builtins) but had decided NOT to provide those via setup, at least at first. Karsten's usual modus operandi is to pop up, ask a few questions, and then go away (and not bother the list) while he solves problems or coordinates with the U/Win folks. So I wouldn't worry -- but I've CC: Karsten on this message... Karsten: PING? --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
