--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:15:48AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote: > >>Perhaps it's time to drop the -mno-cygwin support and just supply a > >>cygwin hosted mingw32 targeted cross compiler? > > > >That is a key question. > > I assume that you're talking about the cygwin gcc and not mingw. If so, > the answer to the question is: No. We can't do this. -mno-cygwin is > needed. > > Please don't make me explain why one more time. > > cgf > Ok, I understand that. Cygwin and mingw have slightly different ways of handling global ctors. The question for mingw developers is more accurately: How do we handle that difference if we add dwarf2 EH registration to startup code. Should we try, with marginal (maintenance and runtime) cost, to maintain status quo?
I don't know how (when/if) cygwin will implement dwarf2 EH. Richard Henderson's patch was spot on, except for wrong use of -1 rather than 0 as sentinel for end of eh_frame table. My preference is to try to keep the differences between mingw and cygwin in gcc code as small as possible. Danny Danny > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-dvlpr mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-dvlpr http://briefcase.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Briefcase - Save your important files online for easy access! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/