> -----Original Message-----
> From: René Møller Fonseca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 8:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: pthread_t and strict standards compliance
>
>
> Hi Heribert,
>
> Of course, you are right. But I'm interested in the most correct
> implementation of the standard(s) and that implies following the very
> word of the standard in question. This policy will generally
> reduce the
> work required when the standard is revised. Something that
> seems not to
> be a problem may turn out to be a big one when the standard
> is revised
> and things MUST BE kept backwards-compatible.
Right. Well any change will _have_ to occur on a cygwin major API boundary - ie from
1.3 to 1.5. That doesn't seem to be in the works yet... If you are interested in
contributing a patch, I'll happily review it.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
