Just a curiousity...

I've a mental concept I've been batting around for a while - about how can we 
drastically increase configure and related script performance on cygwin...

AFAICT the largest performance issue is fork() and exec(). File access is quite fast, 
as is networking. Unix sockets are a go slow given Ralf's testing :p but that's about 
it.

So, what I'm thinking could be done is:
Create a new shell. For the most common current causes of fork()/exec(), make those 
commands internal. Specifically, make all expression evaluation (such as `basename 
foo`) done in-process (i.e. C-style code:{save_context();evalute 
(expression);pop_context(result);}, only spawning commands where they are not 
internal. (Currently, AFAIK, ash and bash use sub-shells quite commonly).

Now that would be a maintenance and coding nightmare - repeating lots of other folk's 
work, and having to get bug compatability as well.... no thanks.

What if, instead of rewriting all those helper commands, we
*) Make each one into a library - ie cygshellbasename0.dll. - with a well-defined 
interface (say execute (int argc, char **argv), AND no ABI changes!
*) Replace the current binary with a façade that uses the .dll.
*) in the shell, look for the library *before* calling the binary, thus saving a 
spawn()
*) Ideally, adapt an existing shell rather than starting new (I'm not a 
reinvent-ze-wheel) kinda guy.

Now I imagine that if done _properly_ the upstream authors won't object too much to 
librarization, so the amount of code to be written is significantly shrunk.

I've not seen a specific project to accomplish this (in google/freshmeat/sourceforge) 
- but I figure that cygwin is _such_ a prime platform for it that if one exists, and 
I'd be repeating work, I'll find someone who knows it here....

Anyway, this is (obviously) a long-term proposition, but if two or three folk from 
here would be interested in collaborating on such a project...

Cheers,
Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to