Read the list archives. :) If you need 3.x, build it yourself.
Stephano Mariani > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf > Of Dockeen > Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2002 3:6 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: GCC 3.0.X and Cygwin > > Is there a reason why base Cygwin still uses 2.95.3 of > gcc, other than you have about 50 x 10^9 other > more important things to do than deal with the > 3 series. Is it somehow a poor match or messes > things up for Cygwin? > > Thanks, > Wayne Keen > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/