> To my great surprise, the close(socket) operation
> took EXTREMELY long. It
> took 0.11 second (CPU usage was low), while this
> operation under MinGW 1.1
> on the same machine took only 0.00019 second. On
> another Linux machine,
> close took 0.000043 second.
>
An strace of fakeweb with a patchec cygwin.dll which prints
an additional timestamp on entering fhandler_socket::close()
shows that the time is consumed in the
fhandler_socket::close().
<snip>
240 10050859 [main] fakeweb 2272 _close: close (4)
110 10050969 [main] fakeweb 2272 fhandler_socket::close:
fhandler_socket::close()
329915 10380884 [main] fakeweb 2272 fhandler_socket::close:
0 = fhandler_socket::close()
<snip>
I assume this happens in the loop with the closesocket()
call. Has anyone additional comments ?
fhandler_socket::close ()
{
debug_printf ("fhandler_socket::close()");
int res = 0;
sigframe thisframe (mainthread);
/* HACK to allow a graceful shutdown even if shutdown()
hasn't been
called by the application. Note that this isn't the
ultimate
solution but it helps in many cases. */
struct linger linger;
linger.l_onoff = 1;
linger.l_linger = 240; /* seconds. default 2MSL value
according to MSDN. */
setsockopt (get_socket (), SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER,
(const char *)&linger, sizeof linger);
while ((res = closesocket (get_socket ()))
&& WSAGetLastError () == WSAEWOULDBLOCK)
continue;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
if (res)
{
set_winsock_errno ();
res = -1;
}
close_secret_event ();
debug_printf ("%d = fhandler_socket::close()", res);
return res;
}
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
